Skip to main content

Magnetic Dipole vs Electric Dipole Explained


Magnetic Dipole Antenna:

Final Standard Formula

Rr = 31200 × (A / 位²)²

Where:

  • A = Area of loop antenna
  • 位 = Wavelength

Step-by-Step Derivation Idea

The derivation starts from the fundamental expression of radiated power of a small loop (magnetic dipole model).

1. Radiated Power Expression

Prad = (畏 k4 I2 A2) / (6蟺)

Where:

  • 畏 = intrinsic impedance of free space = 120蟺
  • k = wave number = 2蟺 / 位

2. Radiation Resistance Definition

Rr = (2 Prad) / I2

Substitution of Constants

Substitute 畏 and k into the power expression:

Prad = [120蟺 × (2蟺/位)4 × I2 A2] / (6蟺)

Simplification Steps

(2蟺)4 = 16蟺4
Prad = (120蟺 × 16蟺4) / (6蟺) × (I2 A2 / 位4)

Simplify constants:

  • 120 / 6 = 20
  • 蟺 cancels partially → 蟺⁴ remains
Prad = 320 蟺4 × (I2 A2 / 位4)

Convert Power to Radiation Resistance

Rr = (2 Prad) / I2
Rr = 640 蟺4 × (A2 / 位4)

Numerical Evaluation

Since:

蟺4 ≈ 97.41
640 × 97.41 ≈ 31200

Final Result

Rr = 31200 × (A / 位²)²

Key Insight

The constant 31200 is not arbitrary. It is derived from:

  • Intrinsic impedance of free space (120蟺)
  • Wave number (2蟺/位)
  • Radiation integral of a small loop (magnetic dipole theory)

In simple terms, it represents the combined effect of electromagnetic wave propagation in free space as predicted by Maxwell’s equations.

Can the Formula Rr = 31200 × (A / 位²)² Be Used for a Half-Wave Dipole?

The short answer is: No, this formula cannot be used for a half-wave dipole antenna.


Why This Formula Works Only for Small Loop Antennas

The formula:

Rr = 31200 × (A / 位²)²

is derived specifically for a small loop antenna (magnetic dipole), where:

  • The loop circumference is much smaller than wavelength (≪ 位)
  • The antenna behaves like a magnetic dipole
  • The field is dominated by loop current and enclosed area (A)

So the key parameter is area of loop (A), not length of conductor.


Why It Does NOT Apply to a Half-Wave Dipole

A half-wave dipole (位/2 antenna) is completely different:

  • It is a linear electric dipole, not a loop
  • Radiation comes from charge separation along a wire
  • Current distribution is sinusoidal along length
  • Not defined by enclosed area (A = not applicable)

Correct Radiation Resistance Formula for Half-Wave Dipole

For a half-wave dipole, the radiation resistance is derived from electromagnetic field integration and is approximately:

Rr ≈ 73 惟

Mathematical Comparison (Why Loop Formula Fails)

Loop Antenna (Magnetic Dipole)

Rr = 31200 × (A / 位²)²

Depends on:

  • Enclosed area A
  • Very small physical structure (A ≪ 位²)

Half-Wave Dipole (Electric Dipole)

Rr ≈ 73 惟

Depends on:

  • Length distribution (≈ 位/2)
  • Sinusoidal current distribution
  • No enclosed area concept

Physical Reason (Key Insight)

The fundamental reason the formula cannot be reused is:

  • Small loop → radiation from magnetic dipole moment
  • Half-wave dipole → radiation from electric dipole moment

These are two different electromagnetic source models with different field equations, so their radiation resistance formulas are not interchangeable.


Conclusion

The formula Rr = 31200 × (A / 位²)² is strictly valid for electrically small loop antennas only.

For a half-wave dipole antenna, the correct radiation resistance is approximately 73 ohms, derived from a completely different electromagnetic model.

Radiation Resistance Formulas for Dipole and Other Antennas

Different antennas have different radiation resistance formulas because their radiation mechanisms are different (electric dipole, magnetic loop, etc.). Below is a clear summary of the most important cases.


1. Small Loop Antenna (Magnetic Dipole)

Used when loop size is much smaller than wavelength (≪ 位).

Rr = 31200 × (A / 位²)²
  • A = area of loop (m²)
  • 位 = wavelength
  • Valid only for electrically small loops

2. Short Dipole (Very Small Length ≪ 位)

A short dipole is a linear antenna much shorter than wavelength.

Rr = 80蟺² (l / 位)²

Approximation:

Rr ≈ 197 (l / 位)² 惟
  • l = length of dipole
  • Valid for very small dipoles (l ≪ 位)

3. Half-Wave Dipole (位/2 Antenna)

This is the most commonly used antenna in practice.

Rr ≈ 73 惟
  • Length ≈ 位/2
  • Sinusoidal current distribution
  • Maximum practical efficiency for simple dipoles

4. Quarter-Wave Monopole

A monopole above a ground plane behaves like half a dipole.

Rr ≈ 36.5 惟
  • Equivalent to half-wave dipole image theory
  • Used in antennas mounted on ground planes

5. General Full-Wave Dipole (Length ≈ 位)

When dipole length increases beyond 位/2, radiation resistance increases and becomes more complex.

Rr varies (typically 100 惟 to 200+ 惟 depending on length)
  • Depends on current distribution
  • Requires numerical methods for exact values

Quick Comparison Table

Antenna Type Radiation Resistance Condition
Small Loop 31200 (A/位²)² Loop ≪ 位
Short Dipole ≈ 197 (l/位)² 惟 l ≪ 位
Half-Wave Dipole ≈ 73 惟 l ≈ 位/2
Quarter-Wave Monopole ≈ 36.5 惟 Ground plane present

Key Insight

Radiation resistance depends strongly on antenna geometry:

  • Loops → magnetic dipole radiation
  • Dipoles → electric dipole radiation
  • Size relative to wavelength controls efficiency

That is why different formulas are required for different antenna types.



Contact Us

Name

Email *

Message *

Popular Posts

LDPC Encoding and Decoding Techniques

Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) Guide Comprehensive analysis of linear error-correcting block codes, Tanner graphs, and 5G-NR implementations. 馃摌 Overview 馃М Encoding 馃З Decoding 馃摎 Resources Theory Encoding Tech Tanner Graph 5G Encoding Decoding 'LDPC' is the abbreviation for 'low density parity check'. LDPC code H matrix contains very few amount of 1's and mostly zeroes. LDPC codes are error correcting code. Using LDPC codes, channel capacities that are close to the theoretical Shannon limit can be achieved. Low density parity check (LDPC) codes are linear error-correcting block code suitable for error correction in a large block sizes transmi...

Gaussian minimum shift keying (GMSK)

馃摌 Overview & Theory 馃М Simulator for GMSK 馃М MSK and GMSK: Understanding the Relationship 馃М MATLAB Code for GMSK 馃摎 Simulation Results for GMSK 馃摎 Q & A and Summary 馃摎 Further Reading Dive into the fascinating world of GMSK modulation, where continuous phase modulation and spectral efficiency come together for robust communication systems! Core Process of GMSK Modulation Phase Accumulation (Integration of Filtered Signal) After applying Gaussian filtering to the Non-Return-to-Zero (NRZ) signal, we integrate the smoothed signal to produce a continuous phase signal. For GMSK, the modulation index is $h=0.5$, meaning a bit '1' results in a phase shift of $\pi/2$: 胃(t) = 2蟺h ∫ 0 t m filtered (蟿) d蟿 This integration is crucial for avoiding abrupt phase transitions, ensuring smooth and continuous phase changes. Phase Mo...

UGC NET Electronic Science Previous Year Question Papers with Solutions

Download Papers and Solutions Exam Pattern Preparation Tips FAQs More Home / Engineering & Other Exams / UGC NET 2026 PYQ 馃搳 Exam Highlights: Electronic Science (88) Feature Details Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) ₹37,000 + HRA per month Eligibility M.Sc/M.Tech in Electronics (55%) Validity of Certificate JRF (3 Years) | Lectureship (Lifetime) 馃摜 Download UGC NET Electronics PDFs Complete collection of previous year question papers, answer keys and explanations for Subject Code 88. Start Downloading 馃搨 View All Question Papers June 2025 - Question Paper Download PDF June 2025 - Sol...

Constellation Diagrams of ASK, PSK, and FSK (with MATLAB Code + Simulator)

Constellation Diagrams: ASK, FSK, and PSK Comprehensive guide to signal space representation, including interactive simulators and MATLAB implementations. 馃摌 Overview 馃М Simulator ⚖️ Theory 馃搱 Q-function 馃摎 Resources BASK Modulation Transmits one of two signals: 0 or $\sqrt{E_b}$, representing binary 0 and 1. Simple but sensitive to noise. BFSK Modulation Transmits one of two signals: $\sqrt{E_b}$ on the Y-axis or $\sqrt{E_b}$ on the X-axis. These are orthogonal signals. BPSK Modulation Transmits $+\sqrt{E_b}$ or $-\sqrt{E_b}$ (antipodal signaling). Most efficient binary scheme. ...

Online Simulator for ASK, FSK, and PSK Signal Generation

Interactive Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Tutorial and Simulator for ASK, FSK, and BPSK modulation techniques. Try our new Digital Signal Processing Simulator!   •   Interactive ASK, FSK, and BPSK tools updated for 2025. Start Now Digital Modulation Visualizer: ASK, FSK, & BPSK Simulator Learn and visualize binary modulation techniques (ASK, FSK, BPSK) in real-time with adjustable carrier and sampling parameters. Perfect for DSP students and engineers. 馃摗 ASK Simulator 馃摱 FSK Simulator 馃帤️ BPSK Simulator 馃摎 More Topics ASK Modulator FSK Modulator BPSK Modulator Demodulation More Topics 1. ASK (Ampli...

MATLAB Code for OTFS (Orthogonal Time Frequency Space)

MATLAB Code for OTFS (Orthogonal Time Frequency Space) %% Clear workspace clc; clear; close all ; %% Step 1: OTFS Parameters N_delay = 4; % Number of delay bins (rows) N_doppler = 4; % Number of Doppler bins (columns) N_sym = N_delay * N_doppler; modOrder = 4; % QPSK SNR_dB = 20; % Noise level %% Step 2: Generate random data symbols data = randi([0 modOrder-1], N_sym, 1); txSymbols = pskmod(data, modOrder, pi/4); disp( 'Transmitted Delay-Doppler symbols:' ); disp(reshape(txSymbols, N_delay, N_doppler)); %% Step 3: Map Delay-Doppler → Time-Frequency (ISFFT) % ISFFT: Inverse Symplectic Finite Fourier Transform % 1. Take IDFT along Doppler (columns) % 2. Take DFT along Delay (rows) ddSymbols = reshape(txSymbols, N_delay, N_doppler); % Step 3a: IDFT along columns (Doppler) tfGrid = ifft(ddSymbols, N_doppler, 2); %IFFT (accross columns) along Doppler → spreads in time (Delay → Time) %FFT (accross rows)along Delay → spreads in frequency (Delay → Frequency) % Step 3b: DFT along ...

1G to 5G Technology - Evolution of Wireless Generations

Cellular wireless evolution Generation Frequency band PHY features Data rate Spectral Eff. (bps/Hz) 1G 850 MHz FDMA, FM N/A N/A 2G 900 MHz, 1.8 GHz TDMA/CDMA, GMSK/QPSK, FEC, PC 10 Kbps < 1 3G 1.8–2.5 GHz CDMA, QAM 1–40 Mbps 1–8 4G 2–8 GHz OFDMA, SC-FDMA, QAM, MIMO-OFDM 100–600 Mbps 15 5G 1–6 GHz mm wave (26–28 GHz) < 1 GHz (massive IoT) visible light? massive MIMO, beamforming D2D, Full duplex, NOMA LDPC and Polar codes OFDM & variants (adapted to extremes?) multi-Gbps several tens Waveform design is the major change between the generations Mobile Wireless Generations Specifications  1G  Voice, Analog traffic, FDMA  2G  Voice, SMS, CS data ...