Skip to main content

5G : Channel modelling for millimeter wave


Channel modelling for millimeter wave 5G communication:

In general, we employ 1. analytical channel modelling; 2. map based channel modelling; and 3. sinusoidal channel modelling for wireless communication channel modelling. Analytical modelling is based on measurements such as pathloss, rms delay spread, and so on. Map-based channel modelling, on the other hand, is focused on the geographical architecture of a specific location. When we derive a channel model for a specific frequency band, we use these two models. We'll focus on channel modelling for millimetre wave communication, which is a promising contender for enabling 5G communications.

When interacting with metal, glass, and other surfaces, mm Wave signals have a higher reflectivity and are more easily absorbed by air, rain, and other elements than signals in lower frequency bands. Furthermore, its diffraction ability is reduced. As we aforementioned channel modelling approaches fall into one of three categories: analytical modelling, map-based modelling, and stochastic modelling. Analytical modelling uses a set of established parameters, whereas ray-tracing-based modelling focuses on locating signal paths in the environment. For applications such as massive MIMO and enhanced beam formation, the map-based model delivers precise and realistic spatial channel features.


Analytical Channel Modelling:

The appropriate statistical parameters such as number of pathways, root-mean-square (RMS) delay spread, path loss, and shadowing of the propagation channel can be produced using the analytical modelling approach, which is based on the data of measurements or statistical characteristics of the scenario. Without taking into account the specifics of the environment, this method can be represented using a given set of parameters. As a result, in an anisotropic radio environment, the analysis result may be inaccurate.


Map-based Channel Modelling:

For applications such as massive MIMO and sophisticated beamforming, the map-based model delivers precise and realistic spatial channel features. It automatically generates spatially consistent modelling for difficult instances like D2D and V2V links with dual-end mobility. Ray tracing is used in conjunction with a reduced 3D geometric description of the propagation environment to create the model. Diffraction, specular reflection, diffuse scattering, and blocking are all considered important propagation mechanisms. The electromagnetic material properties of building walls are modelled as rectangular surfaces. There is no explicit path loss model in the map-based model. Instead, path loss, shadowing, and other propagation features are defined by the map layout and, optionally, a random distribution of objects that account for people, automobiles, and trees, among other things.


General description:

A geometrical representation of the environment – such as a map or a building layout expressed in a three-dimensional (3D) Cartesian coordinate system – is required for any ray-tracing-based model. It is not necessary to have a high level of map detail. Building walls and potentially other fixed structures are the only things that need to be defined.

Here in the above figure signal reaches to cell phone via MPCs where paths are either reflected or reflected. The probability of LOS path decreases as operating frequency increases.


Creation of the environment:

When walls are modelled as rectangular surfaces, a 3D map comprising coordinate points of wall corners is constructed. Both outside and indoor maps, as well as the position of indoor walls within a building block, are defined in the outdoor-to-indoor instance. The map is then strewn with random scattering/shadowing objects that depict persons, automobiles, and other items. The item positions can then be defined either based on a known regular pattern, such as the spectator seats in a stadium, or randomly selected from a uniform distribution with a set situation dependent density.


Determination of propagation pathways:

Direct, diffraction, specular reflection, and diffuse scattering must all be represented for this purpose, as seen in Figure above. The diffuse scattering caused by rough surfaces is compensated for by placing point scatterers on the external walls' surface.

Here in millimeter wave channel modelling map-based channel modeling is very important because here types of obstacle's surfaces, constructional architecture of a area, angle of arrival and departure (AoA and AoD) matters a lot.


Stochastic Channel Modelling:

The stochastic model is based on the Geometry-based Stochastic Channel Models (GSCMs) family, which includes 3GPP 3D Channel Models. It concentrates on path loss, the sum-of-sinusoids approach for calculating large-scale parameters, and so on.

#beamforming

Next Page>>



Contact Us

Name

Email *

Message *

Popular Posts

UGC NET Electronic Science Previous Year Question Papers with Solutions

Download Papers and Solutions Exam Pattern Preparation Tips FAQs More Home / Engineering & Other Exams / UGC NET 2026 PYQ 📊 Exam Highlights: Electronic Science (88) Feature Details Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) ₹37,000 + HRA per month Eligibility M.Sc/M.Tech in Electronics (55%) Validity of Certificate JRF (3 Years) | Lectureship (Lifetime) 📥 Download UGC NET Electronics PDFs Complete collection of previous year question papers, answer keys and explanations for Subject Code 88. Start Downloading 📂 View All Question Papers June 2026 - Question Paper Download PDF June 202...

Online Simulator for ASK, FSK, and PSK Signal Generation

Interactive Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Tutorial and Simulator for ASK, FSK, and BPSK modulation techniques. Try our new Digital Signal Processing Simulator!   •   Interactive ASK, FSK, and BPSK tools updated for 2025. Start Now Digital Modulation Visualizer: ASK, FSK, & BPSK Simulator Learn and visualize binary modulation techniques (ASK, FSK, BPSK) in real-time with adjustable carrier and sampling parameters. Perfect for DSP students and engineers. 📡 ASK Simulator 📶 FSK Simulator 🎚️ BPSK Simulator 📚 More Topics ASK Modulator FSK Modulator BPSK Modulator Demodulation More Topics 1. ASK (Ampli...

Flat vs Frequency Selective Online Simulator

Flat vs Frequency Selective Online Simulator Channel Type Without Fading Flat Fading Multipaths Nakagami m SNR(dB) Run Simulation Input Signal Signal After Fading Constellation Diagram BER vs SNR Explore Advanced Flat vs Frequency-Selective Fading Simulator Want to see these equations in action? Visualize it. Launch Simulator Tool Interactive Rayleigh Fading Simulator Want to see Rayleigh fading in action? Visualize it. Launch Simulator Tool Return to DSP Simulations Main Page →

AM Modulation Online Simulator

Amplitude Modulation Simulator s AM (t) = A c [1 + k a m(t)] cos(ω c t) where, ω = 2Ï€f & k a = Amplitude Sensitivity Modulation index, μ = k a A m Message Frequency (fm): Carrier Frequency (fc): Carrier Amplitude (Ac): Modulation Index (m = Am / Ac): Interactive AM Demodulation Online Simulator Want to see these equations in action? Visualize it. Launch Simulator Tool Interactive AM Power Simulator Visualize it. Launch Simulator Tool Return to DSP Simulations Main Page →

Theoretical BER vs SNR for binary ASK, FSK, and PSK (with MATLAB Code + Simulator)

📘 Overview & Theory 🧮 MATLAB Codes 🧮 Q-function 📚 Further Reading Bit Error Rate (BER) Equations In ASK, noise directly affects the signal amplitude, making it the most vulnerable since the data is carried in amplitude changes. In FSK, data is represented by frequency variations, and because noise typically impacts amplitude more than frequency, FSK is more robust than ASK. In PSK, data is encoded in the signal phase, and BPSK specifically uses 180-degree phase shifts, creating the greatest separation between signal points and therefore achieving the lowest bit error rate (BER) for the same power level. BER formulas for ASK, FSK, and PSK modulation schemes. ASK BER = 0.5 × erfc(0.5 × √SNR) FSK BER = 0.5 × erfc(√(SNR / 2)) PSK BER = 0.5 × erfc(√SNR) ...

Linear vs Circular Convolution

Linear vs Circular Convolution Linear convolution vs circular convolution Linear convolution (what nature does) If: x[n] = transmitted signal h[n] = channel impulse response (multipath) Then the received signal is: y[n] = x[n] * h[n] This means: Past symbols spill into future symbols Causes inter-symbol interference (ISI) DFT of y[n] is not a simple product Circular convolution (what DFT assumes) The DFT assumes periodic signals : y[n] = x[n] ⊛ h[n], where indices wrap around modulo N Only under circular convolution does the DFT satisfy: Y[k] = X[k] · H[k] This is what enables one-tap frequency-domain equalization . What happens in the real channel (linear convolution) The channel performs linear convolution: y[n] = Σ l=0 Lh−1 h[l] x[n-l] But because: CP absorbs the “spillover” Receiver discards CP before DFT The useful part of the received symbol becomes: y[n] = Σ l=0 Lh−1 h[l] x[(n-l) mod N] Modulo inde...

Chirp Signal Simulator

Chirp Signal Simulator Starting Frequency (Hz) Ending Frequency (Hz) Amplitude phase Up-Chirp (unchecked = Down-Chirp) Generate Chirp Demodulate Return to DSP Simulations Main Page →