Skip to main content

Antenna Gain-Combining Methods - EGC, MRC, SC, and RMSGC



 There are different antenna gain-combining methods. They are as follows.


1. Equal gain combining (EGC)

2. Maximum ratio combining (MRC)

3. Selective combining (SC)

4. Root mean square gain combining (RMSGC)

5. Zero-Forcing (ZF) Combining 


1. Equal gain combining method

Equal Gain Combining (EGC) is a diversity combining technique in which the receiver aligns the phase of the received signals from multiple antennas (or channels) but gives them equal amplitude weight before summing.

This means each received signal is phase-corrected to be coherent with others, but no scaling is applied based on signal strength or channel quality (unlike MRC).

Mathematically, for received signals y1, y2, ..., yN with complex channel gains h1, h2, ..., hN, the EGC output is:

yegc = ∑i=1N (hi* / |hi|) · yi

Here:

  • hi is the complex channel gain
  • hi* / |hi| is a unit-magnitude phasor that corrects the phase of each path
  • All corrected signals are added with equal magnitude

2. Maximum ratio combining method

Maximum Ratio Combining (MRC) multiplies each received signal by the complex conjugate of its corresponding channel coefficient. This corrects the phase distortion introduced by the channel and gives more weight to signals with higher power (|h|2).

For example, if y1 and y2 are received signals, and h1, h2 are the complex channel gains, then:

ymrc = h1* · y1 + h2* · y2

MATLAB Code for Maximum Ratio Combining (MRC)


3. Selective combining method

In the selective combing method, we select a few data streamwise with higher SNR values than others. Then we combine them.


4. Root mean square gain combining method. 


We first take the square of individual data stream in the root mean square combining method. Then we sum them. And finally, we take the square root values of the composite data streams. This method shows the near-optimal performance as the maximum ratio combining, as some researcher claims.

5. Zero Forcing Combining

Zero Forcing is a linear combining technique used in MIMO systems to nullify inter-stream interference by inverting the channel. It works under the assumption of perfect channel knowledge (CSI).

The idea:

Given: y = Hx + n
Want to recover: x
Multiply both sides by W = (HHH)-1 HH (or pinv(H) in MATLAB)
Result: x = Wy ≈ x + Wn

It forces WH ≈ I, effectively "undoing" the channel.

 

MATLAB Code for Zero Forcing Combining

%The code is written by SalimWireless.com

clc; clear; close all;

%% Parameters
Nt = 4; % Transmit antennas
Nr = 4; % Receive antennas
numBits = 1e4; % Number of bits per stream
SNRdB = 0; % SNR in dB
numRuns = 100; % Number of independent runs for averaging

%% Precompute noise standard deviation
noiseSigma = 10^(-SNRdB / 20);

%% Accumulator for total errors
totalErrors = 0;

for run = 1:numRuns
% Generate random bits for each run
bits = randi([0 1], Nt, numBits); % Size: [4 x 10000]
txSymbols = 1 - 2 * bits; % BPSK: 0→+1, 1→-1

% Generate random Rayleigh fading channel (4x4)
H = (randn(Nr, Nt) + 1j * randn(Nr, Nt)) / sqrt(2);

% Generate AWGN noise
noise = noiseSigma * (randn(Nr, numBits) + 1j * randn(Nr, numBits)) / sqrt(2);

% Received signal
y = H * txSymbols + noise;

% Zero Forcing equalizer
W_zf = pinv(H);
rxSymbols = W_zf * y;

% BPSK demodulation
rxBits = real(rxSymbols) < 0;

% Count errors
totalErrors = totalErrors + sum(rxBits(:) ~= bits(:));
end

%% Final BER
BER = totalErrors / (Nt * numBits * numRuns);
fprintf('Average BER over %d runs for 4x4 MIMO ZF at %d dB SNR: %.5f\n', numRuns, SNRdB, BER);
web('https://www.salimwireless.com/search?q=antenna%20combining%20methods', '-browser');

Comparison of Diversity Combining Techniques

Method Complexity Performance Key Characteristic
SC Low Poor Selects only the strongest branch.
EGC Medium Moderate Phase alignment without amplitude scaling.
MRC High Optimal Maximizes SNR (Best for Rayleigh Fading).
ZF High Variable Eliminates interference in MIMO systems.

Performance Analysis: BER vs. SNR

In wireless communication, the efficiency of a combining method is measured by its Bit Error Rate (BER) performance against the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR).

  • MRC provides the lowest BER because it optimally weights each branch.
  • SC is the least efficient as it discards the energy available in other branches.
  • EGC is a middle-ground solution, offering better performance than SC but with simpler hardware than MRC (no need for gain amplifiers on each branch).

Applications in Modern Wireless Systems

Antenna combining methods are the backbone of modern telecommunications:

  1. 5G and LTE: Use MRC and Zero-Forcing for Massive MIMO beamforming.
  2. Wi-Fi Routers: Selective combining is often used in consumer-grade routers to switch between internal antennas.
  3. Satellite Communication: EGC is preferred in satellite links where hardware simplicity is required for space-bound receivers.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Which combining method is the best?
A: Maximum Ratio Combining (MRC) is theoretically the best because it provides the maximum possible SNR at the output.

Q: Why use EGC over MRC?
A: EGC is used to reduce hardware complexity and cost, as it does not require the estimation of channel amplitudes, only phases.

Q: What is Diversity Gain?
A: Diversity gain is the improvement in signal-to-interference ratio provided by using multiple antennas to combat fading.

Further Reading 



Contact Us

Name

Email *

Message *

Popular Posts

CMOS Logic Gates: Inverter, NAND, and NOR

CMOS Logic Gates: Inverter, NAND, and NOR Complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) technology forms the backbone of modern digital IC design. Patented by Frank Wanlass in 1963 ( US patent 3,356,858 ), CMOS enables low-power, high-speed, and noise-immune logic circuits. CMOS gates, including inverters, NAND, and NOR, are widely used in both large-scale and small-scale integrated circuits due to their efficiency and versatility. CMOS Inverter A CMOS inverter consists of a complementary pair of PMOS and NMOS transistors. The PMOS transistor connects to the supply voltage V DD , while the NMOS connects to ground. The input voltage V IN controls both gates, and the output voltage V OUT is taken from the connected drains. CMOS inverters are highly energy-efficient and produce minimal heat due to their comple...

UGC NET Electronic Science Previous Year Question Papers with Solutions

Download Papers and Solutions Exam Pattern Preparation Tips FAQs More Home / Engineering & Other Exams / UGC NET 2026 PYQ 📊 Exam Highlights: Electronic Science (88) Feature Details Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) ₹37,000 + HRA per month Eligibility M.Sc/M.Tech in Electronics (55%) Validity of Certificate JRF (3 Years) | Lectureship (Lifetime) 📥 Download UGC NET Electronics PDFs Complete collection of previous year question papers, answer keys and explanations for Subject Code 88. Start Downloading 📂 View All Question Papers June 2026 - Question Paper Download PDF June 202...

Linear vs Circular Convolution

Linear vs Circular Convolution Linear convolution vs circular convolution Linear convolution (what nature does) If: x[n] = transmitted signal h[n] = channel impulse response (multipath) Then the received signal is: y[n] = x[n] * h[n] This means: Past symbols spill into future symbols Causes inter-symbol interference (ISI) DFT of y[n] is not a simple product Circular convolution (what DFT assumes) The DFT assumes periodic signals : y[n] = x[n] ⊛ h[n], where indices wrap around modulo N Only under circular convolution does the DFT satisfy: Y[k] = X[k] · H[k] This is what enables one-tap frequency-domain equalization . What happens in the real channel (linear convolution) The channel performs linear convolution: y[n] = Σ l=0 Lh−1 h[l] x[n-l] But because: CP absorbs the “spillover” Receiver discards CP before DFT The useful part of the received symbol becomes: y[n] = Σ l=0 Lh−1 h[l] x[(n-l) mod N] Modulo inde...

Online Simulator for ASK, FSK, and PSK Signal Generation

Interactive Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Tutorial and Simulator for ASK, FSK, and BPSK modulation techniques. Try our new Digital Signal Processing Simulator!   •   Interactive ASK, FSK, and BPSK tools updated for 2025. Start Now Digital Modulation Visualizer: ASK, FSK, & BPSK Simulator Learn and visualize binary modulation techniques (ASK, FSK, BPSK) in real-time with adjustable carrier and sampling parameters. Perfect for DSP students and engineers. 📡 ASK Simulator 📶 FSK Simulator 🎚️ BPSK Simulator 📚 More Topics ASK Modulator FSK Modulator BPSK Modulator Demodulation More Topics 1. ASK (Ampli...

Flat vs Frequency Selective Online Simulator

Flat vs Frequency Selective Online Simulator Channel Type Without Fading Flat Fading Multipaths Nakagami m SNR(dB) Run Simulation Input Signal Signal After Fading Constellation Diagram BER vs SNR Explore Advanced Flat vs Frequency-Selective Fading Simulator Want to see these equations in action? Visualize it. Launch Simulator Tool Interactive Rayleigh Fading Simulator Want to see Rayleigh fading in action? Visualize it. Launch Simulator Tool Return to DSP Simulations Main Page →

Design of CMOS XOR/XNOR Gates

Design of CMOS XOR/XNOR Gates The semiconductor industry has experienced rapid integration of multimedia applications into mobile electronics, leading to very high integration density in CMOS VLSI. As operating frequencies increase, power consumption, speed, silicon area, and reliability become critical considerations. The XOR-XNOR circuits are fundamental building blocks in arithmetic circuits (Full Adders, Multipliers), compressors, comparators, parity checkers, code converters, error-detecting/correcting codes, and phase detectors. Their performance directly impacts the complex circuits they are used in. Design goals include full output voltage swing, low power consumption, reduced transistor count, minimal delay, and simultaneous non-skewed outputs. Static Logic (Static CMOS) Stat...

MUSIC Algorithm Explained (with MATLAB + Simulator)

Practical Implementation of the MUSIC Algorithm The focus is on how the algorithm works computationally , not just theory, and it explains the denominator (a H E n E n H a) mathematically and intuitively. 1. Introduction The MUSIC (Multiple Signal Classification) algorithm is a high-resolution method used in signal processing and array processing to estimate the Direction of Arrival (DOA) of signals received by a sensor array. Unlike classical beamforming methods, MUSIC uses eigenvector decomposition of the covariance matrix to separate the signal subspace and noise subspace , allowing it to achieve much higher angular resolution. In practical implementations, MUSIC works by: Simulating or collecting array signals Computing the covariance matrix Performing eigenvalue decomposition Separating signal and noise subspaces Scanning possible angles using a steering vector Constructing a pseudo-spectrum where peaks indicate signal directions 2. Signal Mo...

MATLAB code for BER vs SNR for M-QAM, M-PSK, QPSK, BPSK (with Simulation)

🧮 MATLAB Code for BPSK, M-ary PSK, and M-ary QAM Together 🧮 MATLAB Code for M-ary QAM 🧮 MATLAB Code for M-ary PSK 📚 Further Reading MATLAB Script for BER vs. SNR for M-QAM, M-PSK, QPSK, BPSK % Written by Salim Wireless clc; clear; close all; snr_db = -5:2:25; psk_orders = [2, 4, 8, 16, 32]; qam_orders = [4, 16, 64, 256]; ber_psk_results = zeros(length(psk_orders), length(snr_db)); ber_qam_results = zeros(length(qam_orders), length(snr_db)); for i = 1:length(psk_orders) ber_psk_results(i, :) = berawgn(snr_db, 'psk', psk_orders(i), 'nondiff'); end for i = 1:length(qam_orders) ber_qam_results(i, :) = berawgn(snr_db, 'qam', qam_orders(i)); end figure; semilogy(snr_db, ber_psk_results(1, :), 'o-', 'LineWidth', 1.5, 'DisplayName', 'BPSK'); hold on; for i = 2:length(psk_orders) semilogy(snr_db, ber_psk_results(i, :), 'o-', 'DisplayName', sprintf('%d-PSK', psk_or...