Skip to main content

Multiuser Interference (MUI) Mitigation in MIMO with Matched Filters


Introduction to Massive MIMO and MUI

In a massive MIMO system, a base station is equipped with a large number of antennas \( M \), typically in the order of 100 or more. This system simultaneously serves \( K \) users, each with a single antenna. The key advantage of massive MIMO is the ability to exploit spatial diversity, which allows for significant gains in both signal quality and interference suppression.

The signal model in massive MIMO can be described as follows:

\( y = \sum_{i=1}^K \sqrt{p_u} g_i x_i + n \)

where:

  • \( y \) is the received signal vector.
  • \( p_u \) is the power allocated to each user.
  • \( g_i \) is the channel vector of user \( i \), modeled as a complex Gaussian random vector.
  • \( x_i \) is the transmitted symbol by user \( i \).
  • \( n \) is the noise vector, typically modeled as a complex Gaussian with zero mean and identity covariance, \( \mathcal{CN}(0, I) \).

In such a setup, each user’s signal interferes with those of other users, causing multiuser interference (MUI). As the number of users \( K \) increases, managing this interference becomes increasingly complex.


Matched Filter: A Solution to MUI

The matched filter is a classical technique used in communication systems to detect signals in the presence of noise and interference. In the context of massive MIMO, the matched filter operates by aligning the received signal with the channel vector corresponding to the user of interest. For a given user, say user 1, the matched filter weight is designed to be the normalized version of the channel vector, \( g_1 \), such that:

\( w_1 = \frac{g_1}{\|g_1\|} \)

This weight is used to project the received signal \( y \) onto the user’s channel vector, thereby enhancing the desired signal while reducing interference.


Signal and Interference Components After Matched Filtering

After applying the matched filter, the output signal for user 1, denoted as \( r_1 \), can be expressed as:

\( r_1 = \sqrt{p_u} \|g_1\| x_1 + \sqrt{p_u} \sum_{i=2}^K \frac{g_1^H g_i}{\|g_1\|} x_i + \frac{g_1^H}{\|g_1\|} n \)

Here:

  • The first term represents the desired signal, which is scaled by \( \|g_1\| \), the norm of the channel vector.
  • The second term represents the interference from other users. The factor \( \frac{g_1^H g_i}{\|g_1\|} \) is the inner product between the channel vectors of user 1 and the other users, which becomes very small as the number of antennas \( M \) increases.
  • The third term is the noise, which remains Gaussian with a constant variance, \( \mathcal{CN}(0, 1) \), even after projection.

Asymptotic Behavior and Interference Suppression

As the number of antennas \( M \) increases, the matched filter technique becomes increasingly effective at suppressing MUI. The key to this improvement lies in the phenomenon of favorable propagation, which occurs as \( M \) becomes large. In this regime:

  • The channel vectors \( g_1, g_2, \dots, g_K \) become nearly orthogonal to each other.
  • The cross-term interference between different users (i.e., \( \frac{g_1^H g_i}{\|g_1\|} \)) tends to zero as \( M \) grows.

This results in a substantial increase in the Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) for the user of interest. The SINR for user 1, averaged over all realizations of the channel, can be approximated as:

\( \text{SINR} \approx \frac{p_u M \beta_1}{p_u \sum_{i=2}^K \beta_i + 1} \)

where \( \beta_i \) is the average channel gain for user \( i \). As \( M \) increases, the SINR grows proportionally to \( M \), while the interference and noise grow at a slower rate, ultimately making them negligible in comparison to the desired signal.


Massive MIMO Effects and Benefits

The use of the matched filter in massive MIMO systems takes advantage of several important effects that arise as \( M \) grows:

  • Array Gain: The desired signal power grows linearly with the number of antennas \( M \), which leads to an improvement in signal quality.
  • Channel Hardening: As the number of antennas increases, the fluctuations in the channel gains average out, and the channel becomes almost deterministic. This reduces the impact of fast fading and further improves the signal quality.
  • Favorable Propagation: The orthogonality between the channel vectors of different users increases with \( M \), which results in suppression of interference from other users.

These effects combined lead to massive SINR gains and make interference from other users effectively negligible, even as the number of users \( K \) increases.


Conclusion

The matched filter is a powerful tool for mitigating multiuser interference (MUI) in massive MIMO systems. By aligning the received signal with the channel vector corresponding to the user of interest, the matched filter effectively suppresses interference from other users. As the number of antennas increases, the system benefits from favorable propagation, array gain, and channel hardening, which result in substantial improvements in Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) and overall system performance.

In essence, the matched filter technique provides an efficient and low-complexity solution to the problem of MUI, making it a cornerstone of massive MIMO systems, especially in large-scale communication networks.


Further Reading


People are good at skipping over material they already know!

View Related Topics to







Contact Us

Name

Email *

Message *

Popular Posts

BER vs SNR for M-ary QAM, M-ary PSK, QPSK, BPSK, ...

📘 Overview of BER and SNR 🧮 Online Simulator for BER calculation of m-ary QAM and m-ary PSK 🧮 MATLAB Code for BER calculation of M-ary QAM, M-ary PSK, QPSK, BPSK, ... 📚 Further Reading 📂 View Other Topics on M-ary QAM, M-ary PSK, QPSK ... 🧮 Online Simulator for Constellation Diagram of m-ary QAM 🧮 Online Simulator for Constellation Diagram of m-ary PSK 🧮 MATLAB Code for BER calculation of ASK, FSK, and PSK 🧮 MATLAB Code for BER calculation of Alamouti Scheme 🧮 Different approaches to calculate BER vs SNR What is Bit Error Rate (BER)? The abbreviation BER stands for Bit Error Rate, which indicates how many corrupted bits are received (after the demodulation process) compared to the total number of bits sent in a communication process. BER = (number of bits received in error) / (total number of tran...

MATLAB Code for ASK, FSK, and PSK

📘 Overview & Theory 🧮 MATLAB Code for ASK 🧮 MATLAB Code for FSK 🧮 MATLAB Code for PSK 🧮 Simulator for binary ASK, FSK, and PSK Modulations 📚 Further Reading ASK, FSK & PSK HomePage MATLAB Code MATLAB Code for ASK Modulation and Demodulation % The code is written by SalimWireless.Com % Clear previous data and plots clc; clear all; close all; % Parameters Tb = 1; % Bit duration (s) fc = 10; % Carrier frequency (Hz) N_bits = 10; % Number of bits Fs = 100 * fc; % Sampling frequency (ensure at least 2*fc, more for better representation) Ts = 1/Fs; % Sampling interval samples_per_bit = Fs * Tb; % Number of samples per bit duration % Generate random binary data rng(10); % Set random seed for reproducibility binary_data = randi([0, 1], 1, N_bits); % Generate random binary data (0 or 1) % Initialize arrays for continuous signals t_overall = 0:Ts:(N_bits...

Antenna Gain-Combining Methods - EGC, MRC, SC, and RMSGC

📘 Overview 🧮 Equal gain combining (EGC) 🧮 Maximum ratio combining (MRC) 🧮 Selective combining (SC) 🧮 Root mean square gain combining (RMSGC) 🧮 Zero-Forcing (ZF) Combining 🧮 MATLAB Code 📚 Further Reading  There are different antenna gain-combining methods. They are as follows. 1. Equal gain combining (EGC) 2. Maximum ratio combining (MRC) 3. Selective combining (SC) 4. Root mean square gain combining (RMSGC) 5. Zero-Forcing (ZF) Combining  1. Equal gain combining method Equal Gain Combining (EGC) is a diversity combining technique in which the receiver aligns the phase of the received signals from multiple antennas (or channels) but gives them equal amplitude weight before summing. This means each received signal is phase-corrected to be coherent with others, but no scaling is applied based on signal strength or channel quality (unlike MRC). Mathematically, for received signa...

Constellation Diagrams of ASK, PSK, and FSK

📘 Overview of Energy per Bit (Eb / N0) 🧮 Online Simulator for constellation diagrams of ASK, FSK, and PSK 🧮 Theory behind Constellation Diagrams of ASK, FSK, and PSK 🧮 MATLAB Codes for Constellation Diagrams of ASK, FSK, and PSK 📚 Further Reading 📂 Other Topics on Constellation Diagrams of ASK, PSK, and FSK ... 🧮 Simulator for constellation diagrams of m-ary PSK 🧮 Simulator for constellation diagrams of m-ary QAM BASK (Binary ASK) Modulation: Transmits one of two signals: 0 or -√Eb, where Eb​ is the energy per bit. These signals represent binary 0 and 1.    BFSK (Binary FSK) Modulation: Transmits one of two signals: +√Eb​ ( On the y-axis, the phase shift of 90 degrees with respect to the x-axis, which is also termed phase offset ) or √Eb (on x-axis), where Eb​ is the energy per bit. These signals represent binary 0 and 1.  BPSK (Binary PSK) Modulation: Transmits one of two signals...

Comparisons among ASK, PSK, and FSK | And the definitions of each

📘 Comparisons among ASK, FSK, and PSK 🧮 Online Simulator for calculating Bandwidth of ASK, FSK, and PSK 🧮 MATLAB Code for BER vs. SNR Analysis of ASK, FSK, and PSK 📚 Further Reading 📂 View Other Topics on Comparisons among ASK, PSK, and FSK ... 🧮 Comparisons of Noise Sensitivity, Bandwidth, Complexity, etc. 🧮 MATLAB Code for Constellation Diagrams of ASK, FSK, and PSK 🧮 Online Simulator for ASK, FSK, and PSK Generation 🧮 Online Simulator for ASK, FSK, and PSK Constellation 🧮 Some Questions and Answers Modulation ASK, FSK & PSK Constellation MATLAB Simulink MATLAB Code Comparisons among ASK, PSK, and FSK    Comparisons among ASK, PSK, and FSK Comparison among ASK, FSK, and PSK Parameters ASK FSK PSK Variable Characteristics Amplitude Frequency ...

MATLAB code for BER vs SNR for M-QAM, M-PSK, QPSk, BPSK, ...

🧮 MATLAB Code for BPSK, M-ary PSK, and M-ary QAM Together 🧮 MATLAB Code for M-ary QAM 🧮 MATLAB Code for M-ary PSK 📚 Further Reading MATLAB Script for BER vs. SNR for M-QAM, M-PSK, QPSK, BPSK % Written by Salim Wireless clc; clear; close all; num_symbols = 1e5; snr_db = -20:2:20; psk_orders = [2, 4, 8, 16, 32]; qam_orders = [4, 16, 64, 256]; ber_psk_results = zeros(length(psk_orders), length(snr_db)); ber_qam_results = zeros(length(qam_orders), length(snr_db)); for i = 1:length(psk_orders) psk_order = psk_orders(i); for j = 1:length(snr_db) data_symbols = randi([0, psk_order-1], 1, num_symbols); modulated_signal = pskmod(data_symbols, psk_order, pi/psk_order); received_signal = awgn(modulated_signal, snr_db(j), 'measured'); demodulated_symbols = pskdemod(received_signal, psk_order, pi/psk_order); ber_psk_results(i, j) = sum(data_symbols ~= demodulated_symbols) / num_symbols; end end for i...

BER performance of QPSK with BPSK, 4-QAM, 16-QAM, 64-QAM, 256-QAM, etc

📘 Overview 📚 QPSK vs BPSK and QAM: A Comparison of Modulation Schemes in Wireless Communication 📚 Real-World Example 🧮 MATLAB Code 📚 Further Reading   QPSK provides twice the data rate compared to BPSK. However, the bit error rate (BER) is approximately the same as BPSK at low SNR values when gray coding is used. On the other hand, QPSK exhibits similar spectral efficiency to 4-QAM and 16-QAM under low SNR conditions. In very noisy channels, QPSK can sometimes achieve better spectral efficiency than 4-QAM or 16-QAM. In practical wireless communication scenarios, QPSK is commonly used along with QAM techniques, especially where adaptive modulation is applied. Modulation Bits/Symbol Points in Constellation Usage Notes BPSK 1 2 Very robust, used in weak signals QPSK 2 4 Balanced speed & reliability 4-QAM ...

DSB-SC Modulation and Demodulation

📘 Overview 🧮 DSB-SC Modulator 🧮 DSB-SC Detector 🧮 Comparisons Between DSB-SC and SSB-SC 🧮 Q & A and Summary 📚 Further Reading   Double-sideband suppressed-carrier transmission (DSB-SC) is transmission in which frequencies produced by amplitude modulation (AM) are symmetrically spaced above and below the carrier frequency and the carrier level is reduced to the lowest practical level, ideally being completely suppressed. In the DSB-SC modulation, unlike in AM, the wave carrier is not transmitted; thus, much of the power is distributed between the sidebands, which implies an increase of the cover in DSB-SC, compared to AM, for the same power use. DSB-SC transmission is a special case of double-sideband reduced carrier transmission. It is used for radio data systems. This model is frequently used in Amateur radio voice communications, especially on High-Frequency ba...